X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:35:04 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: subinacl not consistent with getfacl under ssh login (USERNAME=SYSTEM)
Message-ID:	<20091116163504.GE20652@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<26355883 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <26366622 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B0114D6 DOT 4030703 AT gmail DOT com> <20091116085120 DOT GD3503 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B0117E3 DOT 5070308 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4B0117E3.5070308@gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:14:11AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Nov 16 09:01, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> aputerguy wrote:
>>>
>>>> So is 'subinacl' just another example of these badly behaved non-Cygwin
>>>> applications?
>>>   Looks like it.
>>>
>>>> If so, is there anything one can do other than to use one of the other
>>>> methods to get a properly authenticated ssh login?
>>>   You mean, apart from the other methods to get a properly authenticated ssh
>>> login, is there a method to get a properly authenticated ssh login?  No, there
>>> is no method to get a properly authenticated ssh login, apart from the methods
>>> to get a properly authenticated ssh login.  If you want a method to get a
>>> properly authenticated ssh login, I'm afraid you're completely stuck; you'll
>>> just have to use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login.
>> 
>> Sounds tricky...
>
>  Yep.  It might be easier to just use one of the methods to get an
>authenticated ssh login instead.

Is that even possible though?

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -