X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered:	true
X-Cloudmark-SP-Result:	v=1.0 c=1 a=Laq68CgWZ0IA:10 a=kCKDY91tEBMc+hi4YtGk8Q==:17 a=ac7BDjC-vltHrh9gCGMA:9 a=G8cSGg7Du5jgQW5p-N4zoMID1C0A:4
Message-ID:	<4AF64D5F.3070408@monai.ca>
Date:	Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:47:27 -0800
From:	Steven Monai <steve+cygwin AT monai DOT ca>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why do 'find' and 'ls' act differently on ACLs
References:	<26250118 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<26250118.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

aputerguy wrote:
> Why do 'ls and 'find' seem to treat the ACL restrictions differently.

They definitely should not. If they do, then there's a bug to be squashed.

> Specifically, 'ls /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' works
> while 'find /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' returns:
>    find: `/c/Documents and Settings/Administrator/': Permission denied

I cannot replicate this behaviour.

Can you provide a minimal test case that reliably demonstrates what
you're seeing? A short script that creates some data, sets some
particular ACLs, and then invokes 'ls' and 'find' would be ideal.

-SM
--


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -