delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <26250118.post@talk.nabble.com> |
Date: | Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:06:35 -0800 (PST) |
From: | aputerguy <nabble AT kosowsky DOT org> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Why do 'find' and 'ls' act differently on ACLs |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
As a newbie to Windoze/ACL security, I am probably missing something. But... Why do 'ls and 'find' seem to treat the ACL restrictions differently. Specifically, 'ls /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' works while 'find /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' returns: find: `/c/Documents and Settings/Administrator/': Permission denied I would have thought that 'ls' and 'find' would be bound by the same ACL restrictions. Am I missing something basic here in my understanding? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Why-do-%27find%27-and-%27ls%27-act-differently-on-ACLs-tp26250118p26250118.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |