X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<26226433.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:38:15 -0800 (PST)
From:	aputerguy <nabble AT kosowsky DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is there a fast way to get acl's for the whole filesystem (or chunk thereof)
In-Reply-To:	<6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj@4ax.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<26222793 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj AT 4ax DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Andrew Schulman-3 wrote:
> getfacl -R?

Unfortunately, no '-R' at least on my updated version.

The "-exec ... \+" and the "-print0 | xargs -0" tricks both worked!!!
Thanks.

Timing and comparing the two approaches, it seems like they both use the
same 'user' time but the xargs approach uses only about half the 'system'
time.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-fast-way-to-get-acl%27s-for-the-whole-filesystem-%28or-chunk-thereof%29-tp26222793p26226433.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -