Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/11/05/04:48:40
On Nov 4 22:38, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > But what about perl? It uses the .dll suffix for modules on Cygwin.
>
> perl uses dl_dlopen.xs on cygwin AFAICT, which basically passes its
> arguments unchanged to the system dlopen.
>
> > Does it call dlopen("foo.dll") or dlopen("foo")?
>
> Looking at DynaLoader_pm.PL (this is self-modifying code, used to
> generate the actual DynaLoader.pm, so it's a little odd):
> [...]
> On cygwin:
> use Config; print join("\n",@Config::Config{qw(dlext so dlsrc)});
> dll
> dll
> dl_dlopen.xs
>
> So it looks like perl itself accepts either a "bare" library name, or a
> properly .dll-decorated one (or even "-lfoo"!) -- but will eventually
> try the .dll extension if "bare" fails.
It looks like perl tries the dll suffix immediately. I just tried
this:
$ perl -e 'use Alias;'
under strace and the first access is already to the file called
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10/i686-cygwin/auto/Alias/Alias.dll
I removed the automatic adding of the .dll suffix, and the above
perl statement still works fine and dlopen succeeds.
I'm going to check this change in. I think I should prepare a new
Cygwin release quite soon, not only for testing this change, but also
due to the cygpath problem.
Thanks to all of you,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -