X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4AF18B62.4050200@aol.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:10:42 -0800
From:	Tim Prince <n8tm AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To:	tprince AT computer DOT org
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Statistical anlysis of cygwin1.dll
References:	<4AF16DE9 DOT 4090000 AT cs DOT uni-bonn DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<4AF16DE9.4090000@cs.uni-bonn.de>
X-AOL-IP:	99.13.231.72
X-AOL-SENDER:	N8TM AT aol DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Thomas Werner wrote:

> i need to analyse the cygwin1.dlls assembler code for statistical 
> purpose. but therefor i need to know which compiler is used and its 
> version. every pe tool i used said "compiler unknown", so can anyone 
> help me?
> 

If a guess that it may have been done with a gcc cross compiler of 
similar version to one of those included in your version of cygwin isn't 
good enough, you could rebuild it yourself.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -