| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: | true |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: | AkoBAGZD70p5LIQZ/2dsb2JhbAAIkWK6WIcPiG+EPQSBYg |
| Message-ID: | <4AEFB41E.3080609@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:39:58 +1100 |
| From: | Chris Cormie <cjcormie AT gmail DOT com> |
| User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel downloading of Cygwin packages |
| References: | <4AEAD9EE DOT 4010009 AT gamr7 DOT com> <20091030125852 DOT GB1361 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4AEBA0D2 DOT 5060001 AT gmail DOT com> <20091031024002 DOT GA19570 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4AEBBED1 DOT 6070802 AT gmail DOT com> <20091031152025 DOT GA22041 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4AEE510F DOT 3050707 AT gmail DOT com> <20091102134859 DOT GC9072 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
| In-Reply-To: | <20091102134859.GC9072@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 02:25:03PM +1100, Chris Cormie wrote: >>> There are barriers to implementing rpm in Cygwin, the most frequently >>> mentioned being the fact that a cygwin process can't easily replace >>> cygwin1.dll or any other running executables. >> If the in-Cygwin package manager can't update core Cygwin, that's not a >> deal breaker IMO: there is a fair bit of useful app package management >> that can be done without changing the core. > > Maybe it's not clear but your personal needs are not really the issue > here. Huh? Why would you think that? I have my own solution for this issue. Personal needs never entered into it. Regards, Chris. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |