delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/10/27/10:06:29

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4AE70C65.9070104@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:06:13 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ash "gotcha", other 1.7 upgrade wrinles
References: <4AE60FFF DOT 7080909 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <4AE613F4 DOT 4080108 AT cygwin DOT com> <f60fe000910262218w79dff551gaf92a289cf1101c6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <f60fe000910262218w79dff551gaf92a289cf1101c6@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/27/2009 01:18 AM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> It is not gratuitous.  'ash' is now 'dash' instead of 'bash'.  Dash is a
>> more standards compliant shell which is also faster.
>
> Huh? ash was never bash, and ash.exe was part of the dash package last
> I checked, so I'm confused by the above statement.

Yes, poor wording on my part.  I meant 'sh', which I suppose isn't particularly
interesting in this thread.  In any case, my point to the OP is that the change
of 'ash' coming from the 'dash' package was intentional and for a good reason
(i.e. to provide a better 'ash' than we've had in the past).

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019