delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:06:57 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: lapack 3.2.1-1 |
Message-ID: | <20091027110657.GA24479@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20091027080250 DOT GA2076 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <51892 DOT 24214 DOT qm AT web25501 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <51892.24214.qm@web25501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:38:59AM +0000, Marco Atzeri wrote: >--- Mar 27/10/09, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > >> On Oct 27 06:52, Fergus wrote: >> >> New versions 3.2.1-1 of >> > >> >> lapack (source) >> >> liblapack0 >> >> liblapack-devel >> > >> > I can see "source" above, but the lack of an >> > install: >> > line under @lapack in the current setup ini file for >> [1.7] datestamp 1256597494 >> > seems to lead to an installation error: >> > Can't open (null) for reading: No such file >> >> I fixed that on sourceware.? The (empty) >> lapack-3.2.1-2.tar.bz2 >> file was missing.? I created one. >> >> >> Corinna > >Thanks, >I have not noticed its absence. > >Is eventually a bug of cygport that does no built the >empty file, or it should the setup.ini build procedure to >advise for it ? If there is an installation error due to a missing tar.bz2 binary then that would point to a setup.exe problem. There's no reason why an empty file should be required. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |