X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
From:	Julio Costa <costaju AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:51:30 +0100
Message-ID:	<af075b00910120351i9733155o6940532a35ca6805@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	hardlink giving out .lnk?
To:	Cygwin Mailing list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Something strange... at least to me.
STC:

/tmp$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PT00062412 1.7.0(0.214/5/3) 2009-10-03 14:33 i686 Cygwin
/tmp$ ls -l /dev/log
srw-rw-rw- 1 SYSTEM root 53 Oct  9 23:12 /dev/log
/tmp$ ln /dev/log log
/tmp$ ls -l
total 1
srw-rw-rw- 2 SYSTEM root 53 Oct  9 23:12 log.lnk

HUH? .lnk?? This is a **hard link**. And even if it was a symbolic,
there's no more .lnk, unless we ask explicitely, right?

FYI, I can do a ln -s log.lnk log, and it still works (eg., with
logger), AFAICS.
But this is probably not the intended way of working.

-- 
___________
Julio Costa

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -