X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4AC1E749.6040504@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:54:01 +1000
From:	Luke Kendall <luke DOT kendall AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Four license questions that affect commercial use of Cygwin
References:	<4AC1D0E4 DOT 3030908 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20090929094557 DOT GD7193 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4AC1E226 DOT 10403 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20090929103734 DOT GE7193 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20090929103734.GE7193@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-TSM-Policy:	FAIL
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 29 20:32, Luke Kendall wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> So, sure, Red Hat *could* do that, but that would mean to take over
>>> responsibility for something which is in the responsibility of the user
>>> in the first place.  Eventually only a lawyer can make sure you comply,
>>> but, apart from the responsibility, the job of a lawyer isn't exactly
>>> for free.  So this is a job to redirect to *your* legal department.
>> I don't think my four questions asked for legal advice,
> 
> In a way, yes.  Licensing is dangerous territory.  If we claim there's
> no exception from A and somebody find that exception, it's a sure way
> to be sued.  I, for one, can do without that.
> 
>> As an engineer, [...]
> 
> As a lawyer, [...]

:-)

> I'm with you on the engineering side, since I hate to reinvent the
> wheel same as you do.  However, this isn't technical, this is legal
> and as such I stay away as much as possible.

Fair enough!

>>> As for licenses with commercial exceptions, personally (IANAL, and I'm
>>> not speaking for Red Hat, nor for the Cygwin community at large, nor did
>>> I actually search for it) I think there is none in the distro, except
>>> for the Cygwin license itself.
>> I can't see anything in http://cygwin.com/licensing.html that says  
>> Cygwin can't be used for commercial purposes (thank goodness!).  Maybe  
>> you meant something else.
>>
>>> And that only applies to exceptions from the GPL.
> 
> You ignored the above sentence, which was the important one.

I confess I didn't ignore it, I just couldn't understand it.

Trying again now, I think you meant that there were no exceptions that 
applied only in commercial situations, except some exceptions relating 
to the GPL (looking at the license, I think it's related to 
redistribution of code that depends on GPL stuff).

I don't think you mean it is saying "you are not allowed to use Cygwin 
within a company, Cygwin is only for personal or scientific 
non-commercial research", and I'm happy that I can't see that. :-)

luke

> Corinna
> 


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -