delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: | true |
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: | AjYBAGMMwUp5LETK/2dsb2JhbAAIkUm1M4FoAY5VgksBgVIFgVg |
Message-ID: | <4AC17184.4020503@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:31:32 +1000 |
From: | Chris Cormie <cjcormie AT gmail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Num lines in dirs: C:\cygwin\bin = 1152 C:\cygwin-1.7\bin = 289 WHY SO FEW? |
References: | <23428999 DOT 1253395327680 DOT JavaMail DOT ngmail AT webmail18 DOT arcor-online DOT net> <20090928220918 DOT GA14260 AT panix DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <20090928220918.GA14260@panix.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
David Combs wrote: > I just now installed 1.7. > > Where *is* everything? > > bin has 289 files, whereas the non-beta has 1152. > > > > > > So, just how "beta" is 1.7. "Alpha"? > > Or am I missing something, eg there's still lots more > for me to install "by hand"? > > > Oh, someone tell me how to find the version number of a cygwin, > and I can tell you what mine is. (Looks like the most recent > files in bin are 15june09, so pretty darned recent, my "standard" > cygwin.) > > ---- > > Oh, *roughly* when might 1.7 become the standard cygwin? A year > or so? > > > Thanks! > > David I don't think you are doing anything wrong David. setup-1.7.exe appears to default to just the Base category packages. The 1.5 setup.exe selects many more packages outside the Base category by default and that's the difference you are seeing. As an aside I like this current behaviour: I have bandwidth constraints and problems with packages interfering with each other and so find it handy to start with a small core Cygwin and add the stuff I need. I don't know how to extract what the default packages are from the old setup.exe: I suspect it's all the Base category packages plus others from a list compiled into the binary though I'd be happy if someone could correct me on that. I notice that setup-1.7.exe has a command line interface with an option to select packages to install. It doesn't appear to be working yet. I sure hope it is a future feature because it would be just the ticket for this issue: compile a list of packages you want to be in your default install and then you could reproduce it at will. Cheers, Chris. ------------------------------------------ Base packages for Cygwin 1.7 editrights findutils login gzip termcap base-passwd libgcc1 alternatives gawk base-files man zlib0 dash libreadline7 bash grep cygwin tzcode coreutils run tar base-cygwin terminfo ipc-utils sed cygwin-doc which rebase -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |