delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/09/23/11:34:29

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4ABA3EB8.40505@cygwin.com>
References: <1253654636 DOT 345 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <583331 DOT 35165 DOT qm AT web33505 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <4AB96384 DOT 3080802 AT gmail DOT com> <361230 DOT 45413 DOT qm AT web33508 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <4ABA3EB8 DOT 40505 AT cygwin DOT com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:34:14 -0700
Message-ID: <5edb39400909230834k3ac4a992taf47f5356e6604a3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Permission denied (publickey,password,keyboard-interactive).
From: Bryan Karsh <bkarsh AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi,

I had a question about this statement:

"Since your user is a domain user, you need to use the '-d' flag
indicated above in
both commands."

I am a domain user, and when I try to use the -d flag, cygwin just
hangs. I'm not sure why..?


On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin)
<reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> On 09/23/2009 11:01 AM, Dave M wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> I checked that readme file. Um, I am not sure what it is telling me, it
>> is =A0not really laid out step by step. I think it would be more useful =
if I
>> read
>> it from the bottom to the top. But still, I THINK I did everything it
>> suggested. I had run ssh-host-config before, today I ran ssh-user-config
>> and
>> made SYSTEM the owner of /var/empty and checked the permissions on the
>> sshd_server account (the host-config script had set them correctly, I
>> didn't
>> have to do anything to the account privileges).
>
> SYSTEM is the proper owner for XP and W2K. =A0For later WIndows versions,=
 it's
> cyg_server. =A0See ssh-host-config and related scripts for all the detail=
s.
> Since it's
> not possible to know what you've done in the process of playing around wi=
th
> this,
> you'll need to manually check all the permissions and ownerships of files
> mentioned
> in the scripts to make sure they are set as they are supposed to be. =A0T=
his
> is why
> using the scripts is highly recommended. =A0It's allot less work and
> error-prone. ;-)
>
> <snip>
>
>> =A0 Also, every time I log in to the bash shell, I get this:
>> Your group is currently "mkgroup". =A0This indicates that
>> the /etc/group (and possibly /etc/passwd) files should be rebuilt.
>> See the man pages for mkpasswd and mkgroup then, for example, run
>> mkpasswd -l [-d]> =A0/etc/passwd
>> mkgroup =A0-l [-d]> =A0/etc/group
>> Note that the -d switch is necessary for domain users.
>> =A0 I have run:
>> mkpasswd -l> =A0/etc/passwd
>> mkgroup =A0-l> =A0/etc/group
>> Both successfully (in that order) and the contents of those files "look"
>> right, but I still keep getting that message. I don't know if this is
>> related or not.
>
> Since your user is a domain user, you need to use the '-d' flag indicated
> above in
> both commands.
>
> --
> Larry Hall =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0htt=
p://www.rfk.com
> RFK Partners, Inc. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(508) 893-9=
779 - RFK Office
> 216 Dalton Rd. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(508) 8=
93-9889 - FAX
> Holliston, MA 01746
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> A: Yes.
>> Q: Are you sure?
>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
>
> --
> Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019