X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4AAE6CC5.2080202@alice.it>
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:18:13 +0200
From:	Angelo Graziosi <angelo DOT graziosi AT alice DOT it>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Reading what should not!
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Administrative users on Windows are
> treated as equivalent to root by Cygwin.

I know that.

> If you're saying that admin users should have to use sudo or
> equivalent to gain elevated access in Cygwin, then that's a feature
> request.  Does it match what Windows does?  Outside of UAC in Vista
> I'm unaware of Administrators having to do anything to activate their
> privileges.

I never said that.


Cheers,
Angelo.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -