X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_65,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:29:19 +0400
Message-ID:	<ddc185be0909140329q30f5b15fvc485fa164c404c97@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	sshd -- "Note that the CYGWIN=ntsec setting is required for public key authentication"
From:	Dmitry Semyonov <linulin AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello all,

I recently had to switch CYGWIN environment of sshd service from
'ntsec' to 'nontsec' (because of 'sed -i' breaking inherited access
rights to some files used by native Windows apps). All seem to work
fine after the change, including public key logins to modified sshd,
but $subj quote from /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/openssh.README worries me a
bit. Is the note still applicable?

-- 
...Bye..Dmitry.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -