delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Date: | Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:54:57 +0200 |
From: | "Vincent R." <forumer AT smartmobili DOT com> |
To: | Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> |
Cc: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: gcc4.4 |
In-Reply-To: | <4AA97E23.8090603@gmail.com> |
References: | <898a6abd66f16c3b76e823ecd65fde39 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <4AA97E23 DOT 8090603 AT gmail DOT com> |
Message-ID: | <b30902b9ea5ef60f06570e0fdc28e5ee@mail.smartmobili.com> |
X-Sender: | forumer AT smartmobili DOT com |
User-Agent: | RoundCube Webmail/0.2 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:30:59 +0100, Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> wrote: > Vincent R. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> when will you release a gcc-4.4 package for cygwin ? >> > > Right now I'm concentrating on getting a stable 4.3.4 package out that > will > have all the fixes for all the known problems in 4.3.2 and will be the > first > fully production-ready version. (I've been struggling with the Ada port > which > seems to want to revert to its prehistory and keeps on magically turning > back > into an SJLJ port... weird. Think I finally got it whipped into shape > though.) > Hum I was wondering why you had posted on gcc ML about ada, now I know. > Next on the list after that is sorting out the MinGW cross-compiler, > which > will be based on 4.3.4 stable. > > And then after that..... I'll probably be more inclined to go straight > for > a test version of 4.5.0, and skip over 4.4 series altogether. Is there any reason to ignore 4.4 family ? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |