X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:54:57 +0200
From:	"Vincent R." <forumer AT smartmobili DOT com>
To:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: gcc4.4
In-Reply-To:	<4AA97E23.8090603@gmail.com>
References:	<898a6abd66f16c3b76e823ecd65fde39 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <4AA97E23 DOT 8090603 AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<b30902b9ea5ef60f06570e0fdc28e5ee@mail.smartmobili.com>
X-Sender:	forumer AT smartmobili DOT com
User-Agent:	RoundCube Webmail/0.2
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:30:59 +0100, Dave Korn
<dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> when will you release a gcc-4.4 package for cygwin ?
>> 
> 
>   Right now I'm concentrating on getting a stable 4.3.4 package out that
>   will
> have all the fixes for all the known problems in 4.3.2 and will be the
> first
> fully production-ready version.  (I've been struggling with the Ada port
> which
> seems to want to revert to its prehistory and keeps on magically turning
> back
> into an SJLJ port... weird.  Think I finally got it whipped into shape
> though.)
> 
Hum I was wondering why you had posted on gcc ML about ada, now I know.


>   Next on the list after that is sorting out the MinGW cross-compiler,
>   which
> will be based on 4.3.4 stable.
> 
>   And then after that.....  I'll probably be more inclined to go
straight
>   for
> a test version of 4.5.0, and skip over 4.4 series altogether.

Is there any reason to ignore 4.4 family ?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -