X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"David Tazartes" <davidt81 AT earthlink DOT net>
To:	"'Jeremy Bopp'" <jeremy AT bopp DOT net>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4A9EB7E9.9030508@bopp.net>
Subject:	RE: Simple bash script is slow to execute - appears to be time spent starting commands like ls
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:45:30 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<E1Miupq-0000A7-Kk@elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
X-ELNK-Trace:	5bf265d7c89f1e8e1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec792b803587bdac518185822abe739e4e8e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Jeremy Bopp wrote:

How about we try to boil this down a little further?  Try running the
following on your various systems and compare the results:

time for n in $(seq 1 10000); do true; done

I'm hopeful that this should help eliminate IO as a bottleneck in your
comparisons.  Maybe someone else has a better suggestion.

If you still see a difference in performance of a similar magnitude as
you do with the echo | cut case, this might argue for fork being your
problem.  I can't say whether or not what you're seeing is really
expected for fork though.  All I know is that fork is fairly slow in
Cygwin.  If it turns out that IO is the issue, I don't think I'll be
much help, not that I'm much help to begin with here. ;-)

It's also possible that you have BLODA on your laptop which could be
interfering in some way.  I think cygcheck is able to identify some of
them for you.  The problem reporting guidelines
(http://cygwin.com/problems.html) contain information for running
cygcheck which may help others identify typical problems.

-----

The true loop is only about 3 times slower on Cygwin than Linux. But: "true"
is a bash built-in, so there is no forking going on. So I'd argue this
absolutely shows there is a forking problem. ("time true" and "time echo hi"
both give all 0's.)

I also noticed that running "echo hi | c:\cygwin\bin\wc -l" just from cmd
seems to pause for a second or so. So perhaps I have just a problem starting
processes quickly in Vista.

cygcheck didn't reveal anything. I looked at the BLODA list and I only have
Symantec Antivirus as mentioned earlier, but I already tried disabling it to
no effect.



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -