X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A9EA46A.2040509@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:59:22 +0100
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: std::arg() bug : not repetitive ?
References:	<264058 DOT 8230 DOT qm AT web25502 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <4A9D6E81 DOT 3070904 AT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20090902T175821-355 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20090902T175821-355@post.gmane.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Backus wrote:

> I guess I'm in the minority here, but I'll go out on a limb and say that the 
> original behavior does NOT seem like a defect to me.  My reasoning:

  You're not on a limb, plenty of people agree with you.  Read the comment
trail on PR323 to hear all the arguments hashed out in endless depth:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323

  In any event, the way it's being resolved is to give everybody what they
want by providing the new -fexcess-precision= switch and let the user choose
on a case-by-case basis, which seems nice to me.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -