X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Waldemar Rachwal <waldemar DOT rachwal AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Howto get Cygwin<->Linux interoperability on NTFS filesystems =?utf-8?b?CShzeW1ib2xpYw==?= links issue)
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:47:05 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	29
Message-ID:	<loom.20090826T224539-960@post.gmane.org>
References:	<loom DOT 20090826T211539-604 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20090826195958 DOT GH4969 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090826203512 DOT GI4969 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes:

> 
> On Aug 26 21:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >   It would be no big problem to support Interix
> > symlink R/O support as well.  After all this time without Interix
> > symlink support, I don't think it's such a pressing problem, though.
> > I'll add it to my TODO list for the time after 1.7.1 has been released.
> 
> Never mind.  It was easier than I anticipated.  I checked in a patch to
> support reading Interix symlinks.  However, this only works as expected
> for relative symlinks, since absolute paths in Interix are different
> from absolute paths in Cygwin due to the different layout of the
> filesystem tree.
> 
> Corinna
> 


Thanks for your prompt response.

Are there any obstacles to get 3. option (interix) R/W? Obviously, it would have
to be marked somehow (mentioned CYGWIN?), and a global switch is just desired.
Otherwise switching from Cygwin to Linux would still be painful - if possible
I'd want to forget about all-these "converters", even if invented by me in my
original mail ;) 

Regards,
Waldemar.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -