X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_93
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:16:17 +0100
From:	Robin Walker <rdhw AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Reply-To:	Robin Walker <rdhw AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: run-1.1.11-1
Message-ID:	<B90CE21C4DCDA1A0319E75BF@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To:	<450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D54669D@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References:	<200908161558 DOT n7GFwZ16011900 AT StraightRunning DOT com> <4A883A1D DOT 10109 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090817084750 DOT GP32408 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A894A82 DOT 2010109 AT cornell DOT edu> <20090817135758 DOT GZ32408 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4385EB0C1AF79960A02CC313 AT qjunbur DOT quns DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D54669D AT DF-M14-04 DOT exchange DOT corp DOT microsoft DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--On 17 August 2009 17:52 +0000 Stephan Mueller wrote:

> Robin Walker wrote:
> " On any NT-class Windows, calling a *.bat file causes a 16-bit
> sub-system to  " be spawned, and the .bat file is interpreted within the
> 16-bit command  " interpreter.
> "
> " Given that Cygwin 1.7 no longer supports Windows 9x systems, it would
> " probably make sense to convert as many .bat files as possible to .cmd
> " files, so that they run within the normal 32-bit command interpreter.
> "
> " Does the startxwin.bat script work when it is renamed startxwin.cmd ?
>
> This is certainly an interesting question, but I'm not sure I believe the
> preceding claim.

OK, I stand corrected.  It looks as if something that bit me more years ago 
than I can remember is not in fact the problem that I mis-remembered it to 
be.

Sorry for wasting your time!

-- 
Robin Walker

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -