X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:12:48 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.7] IPv6 accept() fails if address_len is < sizeof(sockaddr_in6) [was Re: PATCH /usr/include/X11/Xtrans/Xtranssock.c [WAS: Re: xhost package not compiled for IPv6]]
Message-ID:	<20090812161248.GF23876@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4A78A511 DOT 8020109 AT sipxx DOT com> <4A803D7C DOT 6070800 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <4A825EE5 DOT 5020709 AT sipxx DOT com> <4A82BB83 DOT 1090908 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <4A82C835 DOT 9030504 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <20090812135941 DOT GD13438 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A82DDC1 DOT 6050800 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <20090812153511 DOT GD14291 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20090812153511.GD14291@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I have applied a patch to accept(), btw.  This should now work in the
>given scenario.  It occured to me that the returned value is incorrect
>for AF_UNIX/AF_LOCAL sockets, but that was always the case and it's not
>a regression.  Usually  the peer address of an AF_UNIX socket is not of
>interest anyway.  I added that to my TODO list and probably fix that in
>a later release.

A snapshot is coming soon.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -