delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4A82D5CD.1020604@comcast.net> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:46:37 -0400 |
From: | Larry Adams <larryjadams AT comcast DOT net> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Supporting Data Types "ushort_t" and "uchar_t" |
References: | <4A82CBB1 DOT 30507 AT comcast DOT net> <20090812141530 DOT GA14016 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A82CF78 DOT 4050504 AT comcast DOT net> <f60fe000908120726w5b1770efub8b6f17e01ec1f3f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <f60fe000908120726w5b1770efub8b6f17e01ec1f3f@mail.gmail.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mark, It compiles fine on Solaris 10 right now using the two typdef's. However, not in Cygwin. I am presently checking if this is also new to RHEL4/5, SUSE10.2, and FreeBSD. I suspect somewhat similar results. Since the code is ours (The Cacti Group), I can still continue to use "unsigned short int" and "unsigned char" without issues (and I assume Solaris 10 too). My concern is that the "*_t" typedefs are supposed to be hardware architecture agnostic, and there must have been some reason, other than "geeze everything else is that way, so why not do those two" to have done this for Solaris. Larry Mark J. Reed wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Larry Adams wrote: > >> It's Solaris 10 :(. They must "set" the standard these days ;) >> > > Hm. How did Solaris 10 typedefs show up? Does the app in question not > compile out of the box on Linux, either? > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |