delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On 09/08/2009 17:04, Dave Korn wrote: > The current one isn't perfect, no, but is probably marginally better than > anything built from the pre-merge upstream libffi repository. Even after the > merge there were still a bunch of bugs, but I've fixed them in GCC and am just > waiting for one of the guys with privs to sourceware to check them in for me. > > I've backported the fixed libffi for the 4.3 series, so if I get another > release done from there it'll have a good libffi in it. So, whatever happens > next, we'll get a good libffi out of it. So let me put it to you this way: I have two packages requiring libffi, namely gnustep-base and pygobject2, the latter of which explicitly deps libffi-3.0. Which libffi should I use right now, gcc-4.3.2 or standalone? Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |