X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_62,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A7F4184.6090704@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:37:08 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	libffi-3.0 (was: Re: How to install-libLTLIBRARIES dll to bin?)
References:	<6910a60907272310q54f29289l454117aff82afd5a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4A6ED94B DOT 8020003 AT gmail DOT com> <4A7E725C DOT 8010706 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A7ED3C9 DOT 70700 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4A7F098B DOT 6030904 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A7F1317 DOT 4050800 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4A7F1317.4050800@gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 09/08/2009 13:19, Dave Korn wrote:
>    Ah, you won't have seen the recent thread.  GCC and libffi are now synced
> upstream.  The version numbering is a red-herring; there were only ever minor
> discrepancies between the two, it's not meant to be an API bump.

I had wondered about that; a diff of the two versions' headers didn't 
show anything warranting the bump.

> Hm, I'm not sure how (or even if for that matter) it ended up getting resolved,

 From a quick scan of the gcc patches list, it looks like they just 
synced the code between gcc and libffi.  But, AFAICS from gcc SVN, they 
didn't add a libffi.pc pkg-config file, which the standalone version 
provides and some libffi-dependent packages expect to find.  (Yes, I 
know how to override a pkg-config check, but still...)

 > but the upshot of it all is that we should be able to get away with just
> shipping one version between us.

That would be nice, but that won't be available until gcc-4.5, right? 
Until then, is the libffi in gcc-4.[34] work well enough on x86 to use 
in the meantime, particularly if the package explicitly depends on 
libffi-3.0?


Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -