X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-id:	<4A7BADFA.5030000@verizon.net>
Date:	Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:30:50 -0700
From:	Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle AT verizon DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: mintty doesn't run on NT4 due to lack of GetConsoleWindow
References:	<20090806044706 DOT GA2009 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <416096c60908060418p70329409q751c2a3735167998 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D44C0E1 AT DF-M14-04 DOT exchange DOT corp DOT microsoft DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D44C0E1@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 08/06/2009 08:02 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Andy Koppe wrote:
> " (And to be honest I don't see the point in Cygwin 1.7 still supporting
> " NT4. Anyone willing to stick with an OS that's been unsupported for
> " five years should be more than happy to stick with Cygwin 1.5.)
>
> Agreed, it seems a bit inconsistent, and yet I can think of at least two
> reasons a user might want an old Windows and a new Cygwin:
> - user is aiming for as Unixy an experience as possible with minimal
>    Windows interaction, hence always wants latest and greatest Cygwin
>    and hopes never to disturb the Windows OS underneath.
> - user is happy to upgrade Cygwin because of the price, but would
>    rather not upgrade Windows, because of the price.
>
> stephan();
>
>
I use NT4 because it is reliable, responsive, and available (I have it 
already).  I use it to test patches for gfortran under Cygwin 1.7.  I 
figure if it works under NT4 with basic win32 features it is a safe bet 
it will work elsewhere. Maybe I am wrong, but it works for me.  I run in 
VirtualBox on Linux (Linux being my preferred real OS)  I provide 
binaries of gfortran (latest trunk) for Cygwin users as a courtesy and 
to enable as broad a testing base as I can get for this Gnu software.  I 
wish I could encourage more people to just move to Linux, but I am not 
unrealistic about that.

Regards,

Jerry

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -