delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Nahor <nahor.j+gmane AT gmail DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Can't execute scripts from a samba share with 1.7 |
Date: | Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:25:21 -0700 |
Lines: | 26 |
Message-ID: | <h5fho1$u66$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <h5cqnj$c9f$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20090806142010 DOT GE3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <h5f54a$nkt$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20090806180441 DOT GB19829 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) |
In-Reply-To: | <20090806180441.GB19829@calimero.vinschen.de> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 6 10:50, Nahor wrote: > >> One weird thing though, the directory permission are 700 and yet I can >> list the content of the directory, cd in it and add/delete files. So >> permissions are not consistently checked. But then, I assume it's >> because all that is done by Windows/Samba while the permission check on >> the script is done by Cygwin? Same thing with executing binary (I was >> able to execute a binary file copied on the share even though I couldn't >> execute scripts)? >> > Most of Cygwin relys on the permission checks of the underlying OS. > In case of scripts, that's not possible. Therefore it has to check > script permissions explicitely. Note that it doesn't do a simple > POSIX permission bit check, rather it calls an OS function asking > "does *this* account have the right to execute *that* file?" That > should result in the most consistent behaviour, as far as Windows > consistency goes. > Cygwin can't also check with an account with the same login and password? I assume that's what Windows does and why I'm allowed, as a user LOCAL\nahor, to access the share that belongs exclusively to the user DOMAIN\nahor. Nahor -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |