X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:04:02 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Please test the latest snapshot!
Message-ID:	<20090806170402.GA3844@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <20090804180042 DOT GC5001 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090804223616 DOT GA9686 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090806163734 DOT GJ3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090806164531 DOT GC3375 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20090806164531.GC3375@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:45:31PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:37:34PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Aug  4 18:36, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:00:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:30:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> >>> I'm still seeing some weird stuff in the latest snapshot.  This is
>>> >>> a fresh install, with nothing other than the Base category + git,
>>> >>> and substituting just cygwin1.dll.
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libsigsegv.git
>>> >>> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/eblake/libsigsegv/.git/
>>> >>> fatal: write error (Socket operation on non-socket)
>>> >>
>>> >>I'm seeing this behavior even as far back as snapshot 20090706, so it
>>> >>may be some BLODA on this particular machine, rather than a new
>>> >>failure in the latest snapshot.  Other than this weird behavior of
>>> >>git, I haven't seen anything else misbehave with the 20090804 snapshot.
>>> >
>>> >Does that mean you don't see the problem with the 20090704 snapshot or
>>> >that you haven't tested that far back?
>>> >
>>> >I'll try this command out as soon as I can.
>>> 
>>> I tried it and it failed as you indicated.
>>> 
>>> The next snapshot should fix the problem.
>>
>>FWIW, if I change the send/recv buffer sizes back to 65536 in fdsock,
>>it still works for me, every time I try it.  I tried on XP SP3,
>>Server 2008, and Windows 7.
>>
>>Is it possible that this is actually a BLODA problem?
>
>I was, until yesterday, using the McAffee virus checker.  I'll try it again
>with that turned off.

If I set the buffer size up to 65536 it still fails.  If I set it down
it still succeeds.  FWIW, my previous tests were with Windows XP SP2.
Given that Eric is still reporting problems, I guess it could still be
BLODA though.

I can send cygcheck output if that helps.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -