X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:37:34 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Please test the latest snapshot!
Message-ID:	<20090806163734.GJ3204@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <20090804180042 DOT GC5001 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090804223616 DOT GA9686 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20090804223616.GA9686@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Aug  4 18:36, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:00:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:30:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>> I'm still seeing some weird stuff in the latest snapshot.  This is
> >>> a fresh install, with nothing other than the Base category + git,
> >>> and substituting just cygwin1.dll.
> >>> 
> >>> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libsigsegv.git
> >>> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/eblake/libsigsegv/.git/
> >>> fatal: write error (Socket operation on non-socket)
> >>
> >>I'm seeing this behavior even as far back as snapshot 20090706, so it
> >>may be some BLODA on this particular machine, rather than a new
> >>failure in the latest snapshot.  Other than this weird behavior of
> >>git, I haven't seen anything else misbehave with the 20090804 snapshot.
> >
> >Does that mean you don't see the problem with the 20090704 snapshot or
> >that you haven't tested that far back?
> >
> >I'll try this command out as soon as I can.
> 
> I tried it and it failed as you indicated.
> 
> The next snapshot should fix the problem.

FWIW, if I change the send/recv buffer sizes back to 65536 in fdsock,
it still works for me, every time I try it.  I tried on XP SP3,
Server 2008, and Windows 7.

Is it possible that this is actually a BLODA problem?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -