X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A7A5832.4090108@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:12:34 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cl.exe and a C1083 error
References:	<loom DOT 20090806T024338-157 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20090806T024338-157@post.gmane.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 08/05/2009 10:49 PM, Jake wrote:
> So we are using regular make files to invoke the ms compiler.  I get correct
> behavior on the build servers, but not my local system.  The compiler isn't
> picking up the includes we send it on my system.  We use a mount -f -s -b and
> that seems to clear up the posix to win32 path issue on the build servers.  I'm
> not sure if I'm just missing something.  The only obvious thing that I see is
> the build servers is running an older version of cygwin than I am.

I'm going to assume you sent this here because you're using a Cygwin version
of 'make'.  It really doesn't sound like you're using Cygwin in a way it
was intended.  You are probably better off looking at Mingw or some other
native port of 'make'.  Still, from the limited details you've provided,
you're successfully using Cygwin's 'make' (again, I'm assuming, otherwise
your inquiry would be off-topic for this list) on other machines and you're
just having problems on your personal machine.  If that's the case, the
best advice I can offer is to compare your installation and configuration
with the successful machines.  That's likely a quicker route to success
than relying on someone here trying to spot a problem based on the content
of your email to this list, all things considered.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -