Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/08/04/15:13:28
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:06:00PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>2009/8/4 Christopher Faylor:
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>>>2009/8/4 Christopher Faylor:
>>>>On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:35:25PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>>>>>On 01/08/2009 15:10, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>>>>I have uploaded a new Cygwin 1.7 test release, 1.7.0-56.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This fixes the bug introduced in -53 and -54 which resulted in various
>>>>>>problems execing programs as seen here:
>>>>>
>>>>>I have also been having several issues with this release.
>>>>>
>>>>>1) fork() is consistently failing:
>>>>>
>>>>>c209182340 [main] fbpanel 3968 fork: child -1 - died waiting for
>>>>>longjmp before initialization, retry 0, exit code 0xC0000005, errno 11
>>>>>can't spawn cmake-gui Error is Failed to fork (Resource temporarily
>>>>>unavailable)
>>>
>>>I have a simple and repro testcase with a fresh un-rebased perl-5.10.1.
>>>This makes it impossible to get through the testsuite, which always
>>>passed before.
>>>
>>>$ ./perl -Ilib -MPOSIX -e '`perl -e "exit 42"`; print $? ?>> 8' fails
>>>with the fork error 3 [main] perl 1756 fork: child -1 - died waiting
>>>for longjmp before initialization, retry 0, exit code 0xC0000005, errno
>>>11 ...
>>
>> That's not really a simple testcase since it apparently requires that I
>> download and build perl. ?I don't see any problems executing the above
>> command in my fairly clean 1.7.0-56 installation.
>
>Sure. I meant to say simple for me :)
>
>This is with todays snapshot, and regardless of the name,
>the peflags or rebase address of the dlopened perl module.
>
>I'm trying now a simplier testcase without perl involved. Just dlopen
>and then fork..
I don't mind if it involves perl as long as I don't have to build perl.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -