delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:40:35 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: stunnel windows x64 |
Message-ID: | <20090803144035.GA18330@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <165 DOT 508-30910-1427392228-1249302824 AT seznam DOT cz> <200908030905 DOT 04985 DOT andrex AT alumni DOT utexas DOT net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <200908030905.04985.andrex@alumni.utexas.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:05:04AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >On Monday 03 August 2009 08:33:44 Tomas Ulicky wrote: >>Hi, it is possible to start releasing pure x64 version of stunnel? >>OpenSSL exist in x64 version and there is gcc that can create x64 >>binaries. It will be good to have one, because in Windows 2008 R2 >>server there will be uninstallable support for x86 to harden security >>and no x86 binary will run on it. Thanks > >I assume that this is a Cygwin question. Please direct Cygwin >questions to the cygwin mailing list, so that other people can >participate in and benefit from the conversation. > >AFAIK, Cygwin is as of now a purely 32-bit environment. Until there's >a 64- bit DLL to link against, I don't think a 64-bit stunnel would be >possible or useful. That's right Cygwin is purely 32-bit. I think that things will stay that way until someone pays Red Hat (or me) to change this. Making cygwin work in a real 64-bit environment will be quite a bit of work. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |