X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-8.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	Stephan Mueller <Stephan DOT Mueller AT microsoft DOT com>
To:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>,
	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: running MS link.exe under Cygwin sshd?
Date:	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:46:43 +0000
Deferred-Delivery:	Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:47:00 +0000
Message-ID:	<450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D42ED97@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
References:	<COL101-W36BBE2AAC62BCE7BE9CDE4E6110 AT phx DOT gbl> <4A73DD05 DOT 9050404 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4A73DD05.9050404@gmail.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

"   Why VS feels the need to put the PDB access in a separate process under
" separate access rights is very puzzling, but there it is.

I _believe_ it's a separate process to facilitate writing to a single pdb f=
rom multiple simultaneous compiles.  Dunno about the separate access rights.

stephan();


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -