| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| From: | Haojun Bao <baohaojun AT gmail DOT com> |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: Emacs can't start-process more than 30~40 processes |
| References: | <83iqhlbgoc DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <4A6727A8 DOT 2090905 AT cornell DOT edu> <83iqhkur2h DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <834osy98jo DOT fsf_-_ AT gmail DOT com> <83tz0xtt6c DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <20090729023256 DOT GC11458 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <838wi8vt9v DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <20090729232522 DOT GC13645 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:19:03 +0800 |
| In-Reply-To: | <20090729232522.GC13645@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:25:22 -0400") |
| Message-ID: | <83y6q70xyw.fsf@gmail.com> |
| User-Agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.96 (cygwin) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:32:28PM +0800, Haojun Bao wrote:
>>>
>>> Not necessarily. We don't expect these functions to return NULL. It
>>> would be interesting to know how many fds are open at this point. If it
>>> is a large number then maybe we have to start enforcing an fd max. If
>>> it is a "small" number then something is wrong and we're allocating too
>>> much of the cygheap. The cygheap was always supposed to be relatively
>>> small. Maybe we're abusing it too much in 1.7.
>>
>>There are quite some fds. In start-process, emacs will allocate 1 PTY
>>and 1 pipe for each process it starts.
>
> Yes, I assumed that there were a bunch of fds but I was looking for an
> exact number rather than "quite some". I can't give exact details about
> how to find the number now but I thought that since you were looking at
> the code it wouldn't be too hard to figure this value out.
>
Sorry. There are a total of 40 fds in one test run from
/proc/PID/fd. Seems the PTYs and pipes are allocated and released soon,
what remains are /dev/ptmx fds.
$'ls' -l /proc/5668/fd
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 0 -> /dev/tty2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 1 -> /dev/tty2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 2 -> /dev/tty2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 37 -> /dev/tty36
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 38 -> pipe:[2180]|
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bhj None 0 2006-12-01 08:00 39 -> pipe:[2232]|
...
#bhj: fd 3-36 are all opened -> /dev/ptmx
...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |