X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:29:24 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl threads on 2008 R2 64bit = crash ( was: perl 5.10 threads on 1.5.25 = instant crash )
Message-ID:	<20090717162924.GC31572@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4A5F59A1 DOT 1060902 AT gmail DOT com> <20090716195552 DOT GU27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090716211823 DOT GC22617 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090717085727 DOT GW27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A607EE5 DOT 5050306 AT gmail DOT com> <20090717134114 DOT GX27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A608954 DOT 4040301 AT gmail DOT com> <20090717152920 DOT GY27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090717154431 DOT GA31572 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <loom DOT 20090717T161628-634 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20090717T161628-634@post.gmane.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 04:22:01PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please <at> cygwin.com> writes:
>>Right, and I don't know how you could make the claim that Cygwin apps
>>don't install SEH handlers.  We can't possibly know how every Cygwin
>>app does this.  Obviously there's at least one app out there which has
>>decided that it needs to use Windows-specific methods to accomplish a
>>goal.  I'm not exactly thrilled to see code which has decided to dig
>>deep into Windows internals.  That's what Cygwin is supposed to
>>prevent.
>
>If cygwin were to provide a working sigaltstack,...

Yes.  I got that the first time you said it.  That has no effect on my
thrilledness.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -