X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A5CC40E.6080809@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:44:46 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: gold star requests
References:	<20090714042020 DOT GA5598 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090714075102 DOT GA27613 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <0e5p551f49hl847umh3himcnclnp725h4k AT 4ax DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<0e5p551f49hl847umh3himcnclnp725h4k@4ax.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Andrew Schulman wrote:
> 
> All back-ordered gold stars should also now have been awarded.

You might look at old ITA messages, too.  I'm sorta owed some for 
adopting orphaned packages.  I don't know that I really deserve them, 
since I don't release new versions very often, but maybe others who 
actually do put a lot of time into their packages are missing stars.

Also, I don't see why stars expire.  Long service shouldn't be discounted.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -