delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/07/05/22:40:55

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <4A51641B.60903@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:40:27 -0700
From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle AT verizon DOT net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: fresh 1.7, bash fails with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
References: <4A51008E DOT 9050205 AT verizon DOT net> <4A51553C DOT 3080406 AT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <4A51553C.3080406@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
> 
>> bash                 3.2.49-22              OK
>> libreadline6         5.2.14-12              OK
>> libreadline7         6.0.3-1                OK
> 
> Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> 
>> bash                 3.2.49-22
>> libreadline6         5.2.14-12
>> libreadline7         6.0.3-1
> 
>   Err, ok.  So you've got the working versions.  So why do you think you're
> getting the same bug at all?
> 
>   Surely this *has* to be some entirely different issue than the one that's
> breaking a version of bash that you aren't using on a version of windows that
> you aren't using?
> 

I am very happy to accept that this problem is something else.  Vincent sent a 
note that it is working for him.  I am not sure what "working" means.  I have a 
bash prompt, but none of the default environment variables such as prompts and 
paths and setting up the home directory are complete.

My original post was "Bash initialization w/cygwin-1.7"

What is next step.

Regards,

Jerry

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019