X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A4F3D39.4070908@cornell.edu>
Date:	Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:30:01 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: `run emacs' in win32 console cause bad emacs performance
References:	<831voye808 DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <4A4DFE7B DOT 1050500 AT cornell DOT edu> <7veisxsonu DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<7veisxsonu.fsf@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 7/3/2009 12:43 PM, Haojun Bao wrote:
[empty message with attachment]

Was this supposed to be a reply to my request for more information? 
I'll repeat what I said:

> I can't reproduce this, but you haven't really given enough details.
> I don't know if you're using cygwin 1.5 or 1.7, or which version of
> emacs you're running, or....
> 
>   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>   http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Please look at those two links and follow the guidelines for reporting a 
problem.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -