X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A4BDE37.8080808@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:07:51 -0600
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Call for TESTING (was Re: [1.7.0-50] scp progress counter flies through first 175 MB or so)
References:	<20090629092857 DOT GZ30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090629095322 DOT GD30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090629142348 DOT GB19123 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090629144030 DOT GC19123 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4A490F0E DOT 6040806 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20090630112617 DOT GS30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A4A3B64 DOT 4030004 AT etr-usa DOT com> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0906301407590 DOT 4092 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20090701092617 DOT GU30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <2bf229d30907010723r3d1e38caxbb8cc70d998b4ac7 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090701144838 DOT GE30864 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20090701144838.GE30864@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> Just try it and report what happens for you.

I'm seeing similar results to your above benchmarks now, with 20090701:

	upload:   30 MB/s
	download: 47 MB/s

This on the Vista-64 machine that was seeing the original reported 
problem of near-instant 100% on upload.

The 50% speed increase for download vs. upload bothered me until I tried 
SecureCRT's sftp, which gives substantially the same numbers.  I guess 
the difference is in the network or the disks on each end.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -