X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A47FB36.9080300@kc8onw.net>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:22:30 -0400
From:	Jonathan <jonathan AT kc8onw DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.7 ssh/rsync consuming all cpu on x64 Vista
References:	<4A457DAE DOT 7010204 AT kc8onw DOT net> <4A47CD6B DOT 3090802 AT kc8onw DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<4A47CD6B.3090802@kc8onw.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Another data point: I only see the high CPU usage when sending, 
receiving data runs about the expected speed and CPU usage.

On 6/28/2009 4:07 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> I have also tried the rsync transfer from safe mode which makes a BLODA
> issue highly unlikely and then from a clean 1.7 install after renaming
> my existing install folder. Rsync and ssh both max out a processor core
> each for the transfer and it still goes much slower than it should.
>
> Should I test a 1.5 install to see if it's a regression with 1.7 and 64
> bit Vista?
>
> On 6/26/2009 10:02 PM, Jonathan wrote:
>> I've noticed that most of the time when doing an rsync tranfser over ssh
>> from my laptop to my server both ssh and rsync will max out a processor
>> core each and the transfer rate, even on a gigabit LAN, is only about
>> 250KB/s.
>>
>> Other than the slow transfer rate and significant CPU usage rsync seems
>> to run correctly.
>>
>> I tried to browse the strace output from a partial run but I don't know
>> enough to see anything obviously wrong in the strace output.
>>
>> uname -a
>> CYGWIN_NT-6.0-WOW64 SAGER9262 1.7.0(0.210/5/3) 2009-06-18 12:51 i686
>> Cygwin

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -