X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<416096c60906270248h300b9c1cv3a04c251c96414f8@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20090512165404 DOT GW21324 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <3f0ad08d0905140858j17c7b374paa649f18ef18178d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <200905201652 DOT n4KGqYGm000509 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> <200906051625 DOT n55GP6t3028411 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> <3f0ad08d0906060242t275a78e7tb9913bf78d1c5e83 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <200906121538 DOT n5CFcSld014997 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> <3f0ad08d0906140604y49c470eeu68c6c307ec1cd073 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <3f0ad08d0906140618w53c82556ye709c70efc1c65e0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090615084443 DOT GO5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <416096c60906270248h300b9c1cv3a04c251c96414f8 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:40:14 +0900
Message-ID:	<3f0ad08d0906272240t59709967rbdcef5594621e972@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Add "@cjknarrow" modifier (was Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests])
From:	IWAMURO Motonori <deenheart AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi.

2009/6/27 Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>:
> And then there's the Linux compatibility angle, where ja_JP.UTF-8
> means ambiguous width 1 not 2.

I want you not to judge it based on the behavior of current Linux.
Because:
- I don't think the behavior is correct.
- Now, I am creating the patch for the problem.
-- 
IWAMURO Motnori <http://vmi.jp/>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -