X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A3FDACE.3060402@cornell.edu>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:26:06 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: How to avoid having shell scripts which fail from killing Emacs shell?
References:	<41FCBA4373FF4228897280824F4627CF AT corp DOT real DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<41FCBA4373FF4228897280824F4627CF@corp.real.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 6/22/2009 10:53 AM, David Karr wrote:
> I've often been annoyed by shell scripts which fail for particular
> reasons, at which point it causes my Emacs shell buffer to get killed,
> with "Process shell<2> finished".

I don't recall ever seeing this happen, but maybe I just don't remember. 
  Can you give me a simple test case?

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -