Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/06/21/23:20:10
Lists wrote:
>> Lists wrote:
>>> Larry Hall wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>> Can you upgrade to the latest Cygwin 1.7 package and try again.
>>>> From your
>>>> cygcheck output, it looks like things are not correct but this may
>>>> be just
>>>> a problem with an old cygcheck that doesn't know how to find the
>>>> implicit
>>>> mounts. If the issue is still the same, resending the output of the
>>>> new
>>>> cygcheck would be helpful.
>>>
>>> I just downloaded the newest version of cygwin 1.7 as of 6-19-09 at
>>> approximately 3:30 CST and had the exact same results. Please find
>>> the new cygcheck.out file attached. You mentioned above that their
>>> might be a problem with the mounts. Not sure if it helps to know
>>> this, but I can successfully use rsync to copy many gigabytes of
>>> files. It just hangs when there are thousands of files in a single
>>> directory (9,000 seems to always do it.). Also note that this
>>> cygcheck was done on a different computer than the first just to make
>>> sure this isn't computer specific. Again, I have tried it on several.
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>> Your cygcheck output looks more like what I would expect except that it
>> is truncated. Does this happen when you run it or did it just get
>> stopped
>> early?
>>
>> --
>> Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
>> RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
>> 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
>> Holliston, MA 01746
>>
>
> It didn't get stoped early, that is just what it looks like on this
> machine. I ran it again to verify and got what appears to be the same
> thing, at least it seems to stop in the same place. This particular
> machine runs Windows Vista so perhaps that has something to do with it?
> Either way, the rsync results were the same. Attached you should find
> another copy created on yet another machine. Rsync results remain the
> same. This machine runs XP.
OK, this makes me very suspicious that something is getting in your way.
'cygcheck -srv' should contain allot more information than that. And while
I might suspect Vista (though was always able to get valid output on the
Vista installation I used to have), I would never expect a problem getting
the complete output on XP unless something was interfering. Perhaps you're
experiencing the effects of <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#BLODA>?
Ironically, if this is the problem, the cygcheck output is designed to
help spot this kind of problem...
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -