X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<7c6dcbb9c797277cc8ffb1fc985844af@mail.smartmobili.com>
References:	<7c6dcbb9c797277cc8ffb1fc985844af AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:08:57 +0800
Message-ID:	<f4d6f44b0906151808rca5ced9h746119293ba5f242@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Optimize cygwin on recent windows version (Vista and Seven)
From:	Huang Bambo <bambo DOT huang AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I guess it is because of some security specialty, check your settings.

2009/6/15 Vincent R. <forumer AT smartmobili DOT com>:
> Hi,
>
> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo 3.0
> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
> and running windows Seven.
> Now when I test cygwin, everything is so sloooooowww, I know this is not
> something new but do you plan
> to work on this issue ?
> From what I know, the problem comes from fork implementation but actually
> as a user I don't care
> where does it come from I am only noticing I cannot work anymore with
> cygwin.
> Have you ever thought of something to improve things ?
> Will it be one day possible ? Are you lacking some information from MS ?
> It's so annoying that with very modern hardware I feel like runnning a
> windows 3.1 on a 128 KB system ...
> If you answer that it's not possible to do better, in this case I will to
> find alternatives.
> Don't know if mingw could be one of them ?
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -