delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
2009/6/13 Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>: >> I'm not sure which "standard" you are referring to. > > The problem appears to be that there is no standard for the handling > of ambiguous characters. Yes, but the guideline exists. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00444.html > 2) Unicode Standard Annex #11 > http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr11/ recommends: > > 5 Recommendations > (snip) > > When processing or displaying data > (snip) > > Ambiguous characters behave like wide or narrow characters depending > > on the context (language tag, script identification, associated > > font, source of data, or explicit markup; all can provide the > > context). If the context cannot be established reliably, they should > > be treated as narrow characters by default. > Define the default for ja, ko, and zh to use width = 2, with a > @cjknarrow (or whatever) modifier to use width = 1. I think it is good idea. -- IWAMURO Motnori <http://vmi.jp/> -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |