Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/06/13/12:27:27
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:36:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:02:32AM -0700, Xiaoqiang Zheng wrote:
>>* getopt_long() not work properly for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.7/win2003
>>* getopt_long() not work properly for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.5.25-15/win2003
>
>I've read both of your messages (please just send one) and I don't see
>a description of the problem.
>
>>* recv() has problem for tftp-hpa-5.0 on cygwin-1.7/win2003
>> recv() has same problem for tftpd of inetutils-1.5.6 on cygwin-1.7/win2003
>>
>>* recv() has no problem on cygwin 1.5.25-15/win2003
>> recv() has no problem for tftpd of inetutils-1.5.6 on 1.5.25-15/win2003
>
>Ditto. I see printfs with "cygwin:" added but no explanation of
>the problem.
>
>Rather than focusing on capturing random bits of output you need to send
>one (1) mail message with a description of the problem. Read
>http://cygwin.com/problems.html and try, unlike 99% of the people here,
>to comprehend that it is more than a page which says "attach cygcheck
>output" to your bug reports. In particular, pay attention to the link:
>
>http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
>The goal here is to make it as easy as possible for someone to help
>you.
And just to be clear, I'm not saying that the details are not in the
message. However, in particular, the getopt problem is far from clear.
The bug report is overly obscured by excessive amounts of basically
irrelvant information.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -