X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_52,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A323315.9090902@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:51:01 +0100
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.7.0 sem_open
References:	<94b5b62d0906112150g473b49fao41f95c3a1c6e6014 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090612084932 DOT GC5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4A322438 DOT 9050002 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090612101654 DOT GA11934 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090612101958 DOT GB11934 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20090612101958.GB11934@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 12 12:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 12 04:47, Yaakov S wrote:
>>> On 12/06/2009 03:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> Even if linking against librt.a would be necessary on Cygwin
>>> But a stub librt.a would be helpful nonetheless.  It looks like most of  
>>> the relevant symbols are in posix_ipc.cc, timer.cc, and times.cc, but  
>>> there are other symbols defined in the latter two that may not belong in  
>>> librt.
>> Certainly a good idea.  I don't know if it would hurt if too many
>> symbols could be linked against via librt.a.  We could move the
>> realtime functions from timer.cc and times.cc into its own source
>> file.  Or we could create it with only the symbols from posix_ipc.cc,
>> just so it is available for linking.
> 
> For now I did the latter.  Adding more symbols to it shouldn't be much
> of a problem, if required.

  Shouldn't this reuse the speclib mechanism?

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -