delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4A288B1C.7010104@gmail.com> |
References: | <announce DOT 4A189E22 DOT 8050002 AT gmail DOT com> <4A287EBF DOT 5020408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <f89dcc3a0906041922w7f95f86bg86cbef9c5ee14940 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4A2886AD DOT 7000602 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A288B1C DOT 7010104 AT gmail DOT com> |
Date: | Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:11:52 +1000 |
Message-ID: | <f89dcc3a0906042111p328e63es486cf50fff1e652a@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] gmp-4.3.1-1 for cygwin-1.7 |
From: | David Billinghurst <dbcygwin AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On 04/06/2009 21:22, David Billinghurst wrote: >>> As the gmp and mpfr maintainer, can I do anything to fix this? >> >> Are you able to reproduce this? =A0I see you built these with gcc4 but >> with a static libgcc; maybe adding -shared-libgcc would help? > > =A0This is the same problem we experienced with file-5.0.whatever-it-was = just a > little while ago. =A0There is an old bug in ld thst emits relocs that sho= uldn't > be there when compiling a DLL; these relocs then end up getting turned in= to > invalid addresses by rebase, which has no reason to believe there's anyth= ing > incorrect about them and probably nothing it could do even if it did. > > =A0If you build with fresh binutils from CVS head, the created DLL doesn'= t have > the problematic reloc. =A0We're rushing out a new binutils release just a= s soon > as PR977 can be resolved. I'll try this tonight. I have a recent CVS binutils on a machine at home. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |