X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,J_CHICKENPOX_63,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A209311.1030007@cornell.edu>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2009 21:59:45 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: emacs -nw keypad, tpu-edt.el, and C-h
References:	<4A168F2B DOT 4020805 AT cornell DOT edu> <4A1C9952 DOT 8040100 AT cornell DOT edu> <AECBDC9D8B31450CA07DD85A423AD033 AT dc DOT pp DOT rl DOT ac DOT uk> <4A1D9D05 DOT 40407 AT cornell DOT edu> <838wkhsm5e DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <4A1E7C50 DOT 8020505 AT cornell DOT edu> <416096c60905280702m6e4cb748ic305be3592d81c70 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <83ws8042o2 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <4A1FD2B7 DOT 90506 AT cornell DOT edu> <416096c60905290538t1989ba8cq4987a0197c2b61cd AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <416096c60905291459y37ac57a2le64d451d8c5e640a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<416096c60905291459y37ac57a2le64d451d8c5e640a@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/29/2009 5:59 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
> Now of course if emacs can translate low-level console I/O as it sees
> fit, then the Cygwin DLL could also be able to translate Backspace
> into ^? characters rather than ^H, in CYGWIN=tty mode anyway. So I had
> a look at fhandler_console.cc. It already uses ReadConsoleInput(), so
> mapping from VK_BACK to ^? might be fairly straightforward actually.
> 
> I guess Cygwin 1.7 will be the last chance for quite a while to make
> such a change, so is this something that should be considered?  A bit
> of googling tells me that Redhat Linux actually decided to follow the
> Debian guidelines many years ago and used ^? ever since, apart from a
> little wobble in Fedora Core 3.

As I user, I certainly favor having cygwin behave the same as Debian and 
Redhat.  The change would also provide consistency between Cygwin's 
terminals and Cygwin/X.  Is there any downside?

Ken

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -