X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A1DA33D.1080406@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2009 16:31:57 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Long file names not working in cygwin-1.7.0-48
References:	<20090520135009 DOT 5D9C3BD0 AT resin18 DOT mta DOT everyone DOT net> <loom DOT 20090527T181650-410 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20090527T181650-410@post.gmane.org>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

jpa wrote:
>  <jpa <at> oz.net> writes:
> 
>> I can't access long path and file names after updating to cygwin-1.7.0-48.
> Reverting to cygwin-1.7.0-47
>> fixes the problem. I also tried the 2009-05-18 Snapshot DLL. Hopefully this
> isn't a user error.
>>
> 
> Sorry to harp on this but I can't create a directory structure with a long file
> name in cygwin-1.7.0-48 where I can in -47. I'm quite new to cygwin. Is there a
> way for me to test the long file name support and report back to the list so we
> can see if this is a user error?

Probably the easiest way to get feedback on whether this is a user error or
not is to send a STC <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#STC> so that it's easy
for someone else to run your example and see the results.  It also would
clarify exactly what you're doing, so there's no guess-work involved. I'd
also recommend sending your 'cygcheck -s -r -v' output as requested by
<http://cygwin.com/problems.html>, if you haven't already as part of this
thread.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -