X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A1C9952.8040100@cornell.edu>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 21:37:22 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: emacs -nw keypad
References:	<4A168F2B DOT 4020805 AT cornell DOT edu> <2377ADF68DFE455199B53E97E5747E43 AT HEPNTLTIM3> <4A1B17FD DOT 902 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <4A1BD971 DOT 70808 AT cornell DOT edu> <83bppfskbt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <4A1C5831 DOT 6030008 AT cornell DOT edu> <99716858969849F89D65A4015B9948F7 AT HEPNTLTIM3>
In-Reply-To:	<99716858969849F89D65A4015B9948F7@HEPNTLTIM3>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/26/2009 9:11 PM, Tim Adye wrote:
> In Cygwin 1.5 xterm (TERM=xterm), with "emacs -q -nw" (or also with "-f
> tpu-edt") I get
> 
> ESC [ > 1 ; 2 4 2 ; 0 c ESC O q ESC O r ESC O s ESC
> O t ESC O u ESC O v ESC O P l
> 
> The initial "ESC [ > 1 ; 2 4 2 ; 0 c" is just the response from xterm, asked
> for its version number (242). The "ESC O q" to "ESC O v" are the keypad
> "123456", but somehow with numlock on (perhaps this is a feature of my
> Exceed X-server). The "ESC O P l" is the "F1 l" at the end.
> 
> Despite the differences, it looks like neither of us is getting any
> interpretation of the keys.

But this doesn't seem to have anything to do with recent versions of 
emacs.  I just reverted to cygwin's emacs-21.2-13 (in cygwin-1.5) and 
repeated several of my tests (all except the one in rxvt), and the 
results were identical to those I reported before.

I'll bet the problems you reported had nothing to do with updating 
emacs.  Probably when you ran setup.exe to update emacs, other packages 
were updated at the same time, and changes in these are somehow 
responsible for the poor interaction between emacs and the terminal.

I think you should be able to tell what other packages were updated by 
looking at /var/log/setup.log and/or /var/log/setup.log.full.  Could 
terminfo be the culprit?

Chuck, can you help?

Ken

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -